#CODE ON TIME REVIEWS 2018 HOW TO#

Which means they are done more often.ДЄnd these reviews fit much better with iterative, incremental development, providing developers with faster feedback (within a few hours or at most a couple of days, instead of weeks for formal inspections). These light weight reviews (done properly) are just as effective at finding problems in code as inspections, but much less expensive and much easier to schedule and manage. Instead, they take advantage of collaborative code review platforms like Gerrit, CodeFlow, Collaborator, or ReviewBoard or Crucible, or use e-mail to request reviews asynchronously and to exchange information with reviewers. While it can take weeks to schedule a code review meeting, only 4% of defects are found in the meeting itself вЂ“ the rest are all found by reviewers looking through code on their own.ДЄt shops like Microsoft and Google, developers donвЂ™t attend formal code review meetings. There are several recent studies which prove that setting up and holding formal code review meetings add to development delays and costs without adding value. Lots of hassles and delays and paperwork.Д«ut you donвЂ™t have to do code reviews this way вЂ“ and you shouldnвЂ™t. Many people still think of code reviews as expensive formal code inspection meetings, with lots of prep work required before a room full of reviewers can slowly walk through the code together around a table with the help of a moderator and a secretary.

#CODE ON TIME REVIEWS 2018 HOW TO#

HereвЂ™s how to not waste time on code reviews. Less than half of development teams do code reviews and the other half are probably not getting as much out of code reviews as they should.

Code on time reviews 2018